Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:19
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Watch: Netanyahu's First Remark After US Bombs Iran Nuclear Sites - NDTV
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are Chinese hot pot restaurants? What do they serve, and why is it so popular in China?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Protein bars may not have the health benefits that you think, study finds - AOL.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Where are the gay people in India?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Early-season heat dome brings highest temperatures in years to parts of Eastern U.S. - NPR
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
More on Apple’s Trust-Eroding ‘F1 The Movie’ Wallet Ad - Daring Fireball